Resource center

Ashrat Maimon, policy development manager at the NGO Ir Amim, which defends Palestinian rights in Jerusalem, said, “The cynical horror shown by the public security minister mere days be

Writes Betty Herschman:

Yudith Oppenheimer, Ir Amim's Executive Director, says that the wall in Jerusalem “doesn’t just separate Israelis from Palestinians, it separates East Jerusalem from the West Bank. Its construction stemmed from security reasons, but the route that was chosen was exploited in order to fulfill Israeli political, demographic and territorial ambitions.”

Oren Haber: ​“Indeed, it is a pitiless municipal leadership that would displace an elderly woman and then deny her even a makeshift home. It is a heartless system that subjects the Palestinians of East Jerusalem to ongoing house demolitions on grounds of unlicensed construction, while denying them the option to build legally.” 

In 2017, two bills were introduced from the benches of the coalition – the Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel (Amendment No. 2) Bill and the Greater Jerusalem Bill – both designed to substantively change the borders of Jerusalem. Introduced during the 50th anniversary year of the annexation of East Jerusalem, their shared objective was the de facto annexation of the settlement blocs surrounding Jerusalem and the displacement of approximately one third of the Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem living in the eight neighborhoods already effectively detached from the city by the Separation Barrier. These proposals were not raised in a vacuum; they are part of a continuum of initiatives advanced in recent years, all of which aim to unilaterally force determinative territorial-political facts on Jerusalem in the guise of “municipal measures.” Designed over the heads of both the Israeli and Palestinian residents of the city, they will decisively undermine chances for a political resolution on the city, rupture the urban fabric, and escalate the conflict in Jerusalem.

---

This paper describes and analyzes the plans and bills – one of which has now been passed into legislation – and their implications for the character of Jerusalem, its residents, and the political future of the city. It proposes recommendations for an alternative framework, with the goal of strengthening the fabric of life for both the Israeli and Palestinian populations of the city, encouraging dialogue between the two national groups, and promoting conditions for an agreed political solution.

Map showing settlements and national parks surrounding the Old City area.

Ir Amim’s Betty Herschman said that Israel had seen a “groundswell of unilateral proposals” for Jerusalem by Israeli leaders under the Trump administration.

Ir Amim's Betty Herschman, Director of International Relations & Advocacy: “Trump took pains to clarify that the U.S. would take no formal position on borders or other final status issues. In fact, any pretext of neutrality was rendered invalid as soon as he recognized Jerusalem as capital of Israel.”